Heart rate variability in patients after catheter-based radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation

Main Article Content

E. O. Perepeka
V. V. Lazoryshynets

Abstract

The aim – to analyze the dynamics of heart rate variability in patients who underwent radiofrequency isolation of pulmonary veins using the «high power – short duration» technique, and to determine its relationship with the probability of arrhythmia recurrence in the postoperative period.
Materials and methods. To conduct a study of heart rate variability, a total of 114 patients with paroxysmal and persistent forms of atrial fibrillation (AF) were analyzed, who underwent catheter radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation at the State Institution «National Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery named after M.M. Amosov of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine» for the period from May 2022 to December 2024. 49 patients were selected for the study in whom long-term results regarding arrhythmia recurrence were monitored.
Results. The follow-up period of patients after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was on average 19.87±7.56 months (range 8 to 34 months). The frequency of arrhythmia recurrence during this period was 38 %. 26.4 % of patients were diagnosed with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). At all time points, patients without recurrence had a higher mean heart rate, which may indicate a more effective denervation. The largest difference was observed after 2 months: in patients without recurrence 73.44±9.93 beats/min, with recurrence: 62.50±10.45 beats/min (p=0.01). After 1, 6, and 12 months, there was a trend towards a decrease in heart rate in the group of patients with arrhythmia recurrence, although it did not reach statistical significance (p>0.05). Patients with recurrence showed significantly higher RMSSD values, especially at 2 and 12 months. 2 months: 51.25±68.60 vs 19.00±11.59 (p=0.365); 12 months: 32.6±22.9 vs 15.43±6.00 (p=0.026). At 1 month, SDNN was significantly higher in patients with recurrence: 77.50±38.78 vs 53.51±20.86 (p=0.047). SDNNi is also higher in patients with relapse: 1 month – 44.13±25.31 vs 28.00±11.26 (p=0.021); 2 months: 55.0±38.4 vs 26.67±4.23 (p=0.002). This may be due to incomplete or transient modulation of ganglionic structures, which is manifested by a high SDNN. At later times (6–12 months), the differences smoothed out and statistical significance was not found. pNN50 is another marker of parasympathetic activity. Significant differences in pNN50 were found at 12 months: 8.95±9.92 (with relapse) vs 1.78±1.78 (without) (p=0.026). Paroxysmal AF was more common in the group without recurrence (86 % vs. 73 %), which was statistically significant (p=0.022). Also, the end-diastolic index (EDI) was significantly higher in the group without recurrence (66.02±9.78 vs. 59.56±4.05; p=0.023). The left atrial diameter tended to be larger in the group of patients with recurrence ((43.47±5.15) vs. (41.77±4.64) mm; p=0.091). Body mass index (BMI) tended to be higher in the group without recurrence (30.35±5.78 vs. 27.36±3.84; p=0.054), but the difference did not reach statistical significance.
Conclusions. Patients with signs of more pronounced intraoperative modification of parasympathetic ganglia functions during catheter radiofrequency isolation of the lungs with fewer arrhythmia recurrences during time control are observed in 19.87±7.56 months. Lower RMSSD values ​​in use without recurrence, especially in the early stages after ablation, as well as lower pNN50 values ​​after 12 months confirm a decrease in parasympathetic activity, compared with patients in whom arrhythmia recurrence occurred. Changes in HRV may be useful for assessing the effectiveness of concomitant cardioneuroablation during pulmonary vein isolation.

Article Details

Keywords:

ablation, pacemaker, atrial fibrillation, navigation system, left atrial fibrosis, cryoballoon ablation, pulsed field ablation, cardioneuroablation

References

Lippi G, Sanchis-Gomar F, Cervellin G. Global epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: An increasing epidemic and public health challenge. Int J Stroke. 2021 Feb;16(2):217-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493019897870

Bizhanov KA, Аbzaliyev KB, Baimbetov AK, Sarsenbayeva AB, Lyan E. Atrial fibrillation: Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical complications (literature review). J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Jan;34(1):153-165. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.15759

Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, Benjamin EJ, Chyou JY, Cronin EM, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-e156. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193

Van Gelder IC, Rienstra M, Bunting KV, Casado-Arroyo R, Caso V, Crijns HJGM, De Potter TJR, Dwight J, Guasti L, Hanke T, Jaarsma T, Lettino M, Løchen ML, Lumbers RT, Maesen B, Mølgaard I, Rosano GMC, Sanders P, Schnabel RB, Suwalski P, Svennberg E, Tamargo J, Tica O, Traykov V, Tzeis S, Kotecha D; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 202421 Sep;45(36):3314–3414. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae176

Sau A, Howard JP, Al-Aidarous S, Ferreira-Martins J, Al-Khayatt B, Lim PB, Kanagaratnam P, Whinnett ZI, Peters NS, Sikkel MB, Francis DP, Sohaib SMA. Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation With Pulmonary Vein Isolation Versus Without. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Aug;5(8):968-976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2019.05.012

Vempati R, Garg A, Shah M, Jena N, Raj K, Reddy YM, Noheria A, Ha QD, Umashankar D, Toquica Gahona C. Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation: A State-of-the-Art Review. Hearts. 2025; 6(2):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/hearts6020012

Zhang E, Liang S, Sun T, Xu J, Lu F, Wu D, Zhang J, He L, Zhang F, Fan S, Ma W. Prognostic value of heart rate variability in atrial fibrillation recurrence following catheter ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Feb 2;9:1048398. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1048398

Drexler M, Blum T, Heinroth KM, Hartkopf T, Plehn A, Schirdewahn P, Sedding DG. Heart rate variability as a predictor of successful catheter-guided pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. Herz. 2024 Mar;49(2):147-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-023-05201-6

von Olshausen G, Saluveer O, Schwieler J, Drca N, Bastani H, Tapanainen J, et al. Sinus heart rate post pulmonary vein ablation and long-term risk of recurrences. Clin Res Cardiol. 2021;110:851–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01765-z

Yu HT, Kim TH, Uhm JS, Kim JY, Joung B, Lee MH, et al. Prognosis of high sinus heart rate after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Europace 2017;19:1132–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euw142

Goff ZD, Laczay B, Yenokyan G, Sivasambu B, Sinha SK, Marine JE, et al. Heart rate increase after pulmonary vein isolation predicts freedom from atrial fibrillation at 1 year. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30:2818–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.14257

Wang K, Chang D, Chu Z, Yang Y, Gao L, Zhang S, Xia Y, Dong Y, Yin X, Cong P, Jia J. Denervation as a common mechanism underlying different pulmonary vein isolation strategies for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: evidenced by heart rate variability after ablation. Scientific World J. 2013 Aug 24;2013:569564. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/569564

Vassallo F, Cunha C, Corsino L, Serpa E, Simões A Jr, Hespanhol D, Lovatto CV, Gasparini D, Barbosa LF, Schmidt A. High Power Short Duration Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Long-Term Predictors of Success and Recurrence - A Multivariate Analysis. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024 Nov;121(12):e20230837. Portuguese, English. https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20230837

Vassallo F, Corcino L, Cunha C, Serpa E, Lovatto C, Simoes A Jr, Carloni H, Hespanhol D, Gasparini D, Barbosa LF, Schmidt A. Incidental parasympathetic cardiac denervation during atrial fibrillation ablation using high power short duration: a marker of long-term success. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Mar;68(2):371-377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-023-01653-2

Vassallo F, Meigre LL, Cunha C, Serpa E, Simoes A Jr, Lovatto C, Gasparini D, Corcino L, Schmidt A. Comparison of outcomes with low-power long duration versus high-power short duration of ablation: the role of the acute change in sinus rhythm after the ablation as a predictor of long-term success. Heart Vessels. 2022 Oct;37(10):1749-1756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-022-02066-3

Musikantow DR, Neuzil P, Petru J, Koruth JS, Kralovec S, Miller MA, Funasako M, Chovanec M, Turagam MK, Whang W, Sediva L, Dukkipati SR, Reddy VY. Pulsed Field Ablation to Treat Atrial Fibrillation: Autonomic Nervous System Effects. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2023 Apr;9(4):481-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2022.10.028

Pachon-M JC, Pachon-M EI, Santillana-P TG, Lobo TJ, Pachon CTC, Pachon-M JC, Pachon MZC, Clark J. Vagal AF induction test (VAFIT): a new endpoint for optimizing atrial fibrillation ablation through cardioneuroablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Mar;68(2):293-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02007-w

Hardy C, Rivarola E, Scanavacca M. Role of Ganglionated Plexus Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation on the Basis of Supporting Evidence. J Atr Fibrillation. 2020 Jun 30;13(1):2405. https://doi.org/10.4022/jafib.2405

Kampaktsis PN, Oikonomou EK, Y Choi D, Cheung JW. Efficacy of ganglionated plexi ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal versus persistent atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017 Dec;50(3):253-260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-017-0285-z

Aksu T, Skeete JR, Huang HH. Ganglionic Plexus Ablation: A Step-by-step Guide for Electrophysiologists and Review of Modalities for Neuromodulation for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2023 Jan;12:e02. https://doi.org/10.15420/aer.2022.37